Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

The level playing field has now been paved over with speed bumps ... OR ... "cleaning up B.C.’s “wild west” system of campaign finance" GreeNDP style



What do I think about the taxpayers of British Columbia chipping in millions of dollars for the election campaigns of Andrew Weaver and his Green Party?  John Horgan and his NDP?  Whoever is the next leader of the BC Liberals?  Or even for the party that I support -- the BC Conservatives? 

I was honestly speechless earlier on first hearing, and reading, the news!  Friends of mine on Social media certainly had thoughts; here's just a few of them:

... I'm pretty sure John Horgan explicitly said there is no way that a ban on corporate and union donations would result in taxpayer funded campaigns ..."

" ... brutal ..."

"... because its so much more important that they take from everybody, rather than just those who are looking for favours ... we are sooooooo screwed ..."

" ... the bull shit NDP and Green conspiracy reveals its true nature in their campaign financing rules ..."

"... most people I've spoken with don't want to see direct to party subsidies or reimbursements ... "


And as Vaughn Palmer stated in an opinion piece in the Vancouver Sun; “The Greens just won the lottery,” as one of my colleagues remarked.  Yes, but how often does the holder of the winning ticket get to pick it himself and also have a hand in setting the size of the prize?

The question being asked though is when did either Horgan, or Weaver, EVER state during Mays Provincial election campaign, that this was a plan they were considering? 

I'll tell you when -- it was NEVER!

And I'll go so far as to say Weaver was the worst of the two (between Horgan and himself), when it comes to having clean hands, after he was so officious and preachy about ridding BC of questionable donations.


Remember this story from the Globe and Mail back in May? 
 ... when it came to campaign donations, his (Andrew Weaver) party was hitting up a prominent member of the Vancouver development community and major BC Liberal Party donor for a $30,000 contribution... the party said it approached "three or four" people about the possibility of donating up to this amount ...

In July of this year he also was quoted as stating that, There is no reason why any B.C. political party should be accepting (those) donations.  Now is the time to end this practice while we move toward legislation on this file.”

Little did ANYONE know then, that his plan was to move back room deals from out of boardroom, and instead into the dark corners of the BC legislature, as he and Horgan schemed up this outrageous plan.

Having taxpayers fund future election campaigns, for ANY political party, is WRONG.  And if that was the plan all along, both Horgan and Weaver should have stated so!

For anyone not supporting any of the parties, I mentioned at the start of this post, I also have to think that this plan really borders on being taxation with out representation.

Also, in the fine points, is there (or will there be) any plan for individuals running as independents?  If not, then why not?  Would their campaigns be any less 'representative', or 'democratic', for the people who vote for them?  Why should they not be funded as well?

This scheme, or plan, is simply wrong on every single level.

If political parties cannot get the public to support them financially, then too bad for them.  They either have to present plans and policy that people will support, or else they should simply whither and die. 

Those should be the only two choices, because those sitting in the BC Legislature have no moral authority to pass into legislation this little scheme of theirs.

IF they (the BC NDP and Green Parties) wish to present this idea in the NEXT election, and if they are elected, well then that will be another matter and I'll have to live with it.  Until then however, contact your MLA ... write to your local paper ... bombard your MLA with emails and letters.

It's wrong -- so let them know!

What thoughts do you have on the matter?  Do you agree or disagree?  The floors yours, and I'd love to hear from you!

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more