Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

What qualifies someone to lead the BC Liberals? The individual doesn't need to have deep political experience ... the power of charisma goes a long ways



Jason Kenney, leader of the United Conservative Party

QUESTION:
Who among any of the leadership candidate hoping to be elected on February 3rd, has ruffled any sacred feathers in the BC Liberal Party?



IF the BC Liberal Party is indeed the free enterprise coalition (a claim I have shredded on numerous occasions), then why has no leadership candidate mentioned anything about the success of Jason Kenney’s unity party right next door in Alberta?



Is it NOT a welcomed idea, and if so, why not?   Like Kenney, a new leader will have to mold the party (again that so-called coalition) into the form and shape he or she desires. 

Have I missed the news story somewhere?  The one where the media ask candidates why this discussion, on a comparable free-enterprise party’s in Canada, isn't part of the discussion.  Especially during a leadership race?



Perhaps it has to do with the fact that no one, in the media, has ever asked the capitol "L" liberal side of the coalition (at least to the best of my knowledge) what they've had to give up, or been expected to give up, to keep the coalition strong.




I for one would have to believe (given what we have all seen) that conservatives in the coalition have given up first social, and now fiscal policies for the sake of what?  What about parental rights ... mounting debt ... and more?



Why is that?  Is it because the BC Liberal Party, with powerful federal Liberals  in positions of power, are quintessential political chameleons?  Everyone knows they campaign on the right, and then govern on the left.



HERE'S ANOTHER QUESTION:
Can we ask who has the biggest CAPITOL 'L' Liberal tag stuck on their back?



Perhaps foremost in my mind, would be new comer Michael Lee.  That's because  Lee's campaign team includes Mark Marissen, a former strategist for the Liberal Party of Canada and the ex-husband of former premier Christy Clark.  Doesn't that alone blow his conservative posturing?  Seriously, after Marissen became part of Team Lee, what card carrying BC Liberal could honestly trust his self-touted credentials in being conservative?



Want more to bolster that thought?



On September 26th, in an interview with the CBC, Lee was asked about former premier Christy Clark's contentious throne speech.  The one last June in which she borrowed? / stole? numerous policies directly from the Greens and NDP -- ones fiscally reckless.  Lee was very much a supporter of Christy Clark's throne speech.



And on the same day in the Vancouver Sun, Michael Lee got this ringing endorsement as to why he could be elected as the next leader:  "He may not have deep political experience, but you can’t discount the power of charisma."


Great!  That's all we need!  Another sunny ways headed our way!


Interestingly enough I have also had it presented to me, by several BC political friends, that Todd Stone should be firmly planted in the capitol "L" camp as well.  Honestly I have to say I find that interesting.



I think we can look at the unnerving silence, from the (again so-called) BC Liberal coalition, that it really isn't one of compromises.  Rather, it is very much a big "L" liberal party of the same mold as it's federal counterpart.



Former Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts
Could that change with former Surrey mayor, and for a very brief time Conservative Party MP, Diane Watts at the helm?  I don’t know.  What I do believe however, is her only chance is a win on the first ballot.



While there does appear to be a strong sentiment for change, how far will the hierarchy at the helm allow that change to be permitted?   The party has doubled its membership in this race, and I hear she is doing well in the sign-ups.  Regardless, she has a HUGE hill to climb.



Have I forgotten all of the others?  Certainly not.



Andrew Wilkinson is the quintessential bureaucrat -- no chance.  Ditto for Dianne Watts.



If Mike de Jong is elected I have to wonder if we'll see a repeat of when Social Credit elected Rita Johnson.



I'm just guessing, but if I was to put a dollar on the winner, my bet would be on a Sam Sullivan win -- but only after several rounds of counting votes.



I'm Alan Forseth in Kamloops.  The floors is now yours to share your thoughts.

Comments

  1. Liberals govern on the left? Put down that Kool-aid. It is retarding you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll just smile at that Allison, and have another sip from my coffee. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well analyzed and well said Alan......and I especially like how you handled that shrill's comment!lol....Carry on my friend! Loren

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PEATS: I am writing with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community

The following is a copy of a letter sent to me, which was sent to BC’s Minister of Health Adrian Dix. It is with regards to the impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic in Dawson Creek.   Dear Minister,   I am writing to you today with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community. The closure, scheduled for the summer of 2024, is a result of the utterly burdensome terms and conditions imposed by the bureaucratic Northern Health. As a result, Dawson Creek stands to lose four doctors who have made this city their home, and who wish to continue serving the people of our community.   The impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic is a significant blow to our city. Not only will it result in the loss of highly qualified and dedicated healthcare professionals, but it will also deprive thousands of Dawson Creek residents of access to their primary physicians. At a time when healthcare se

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Labels

Show more